Future of Sex
tagline
  • Remote Sex
  • Virtual Sex & Entertainment
  • Robots
  • Human Augmentation
  • Sex Tech
  • Dating & Relationships
  • Bizarre Bazaar 18+
  • Future of Sex Community
  • Remote Sex
  • Virtual Sex & Entertainment
  • Robots
  • Human Augmentation
  • Sex Tech
  • Dating & Relationships
  • Bizarre Bazaar 18+
  • Future of Sex Community
  • Sex Tech Crowds Played It Coy at CES 2021 Virtual Summit

  • The Hottest Parody Sex Games of 2021

  • That Time I Saw Moaning Sexbots at an Adult Expo [VIDEO]

  • Sex Tech Hackers Will Get ‘Touchy-Feely’ at Virtual Event This Weekend

  • How Learning from 2020 Can Give Us Sexier, Healthier Sex Lives in 2021

  • Designers Unveil Wildly Creative Fashions for Pandemic Living

  • This Stroker Gives Female-like Orgasms to Trans People and Men

  • Lora DiCarlo Responds to WOW Tech Group’s ‘Pleasure Air Technology’ Patent Claims

Future of Sex is supported by our readers. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

Home > Sex Tech > The Case Against Consent Apps from a Legal Scholar

Sex Tech
Home›Sex Tech›The Case Against Consent Apps from a Legal Scholar

The Case Against Consent Apps from a Legal Scholar

By Tom Woodley
March 30, 2018
2026
0

There's an app for almost everything. Maybe there shouldn't be. 

Consent is the “moral magic” that changes the meaning of sexual relations.

But because consent signals leave little evidence, instances of non-consent often devolve into cases of he said/she said. Fortunately, wouldn’t you guess it, there’s an app for that. Several, in fact.

Inspired by recent policies of affirmative consent in colleges and legislation, developers have released smartphones apps designed to stimulate conversations about consent and record assertions of both consent and non-consent.

But they’ve also attracted their fair share of critics. Among them is legal philosopher John Danaher of the University of Galway, Ireland. In a paper published last year, he argues that the apps do more potential harm than good.

Danaher’s objections

Consent apps record consent in different ways.

Good2Go (now defunct) involved tapping a screen to signal consent or lack thereof and admitting one’s state of intoxication. On the other hand, We-Consent, part of a suite of apps, records a video of both parties conceding consent, while SaSie makes user sign a contract. The most recent arrival on the scene, LegalFling, comes with a host of options for what a partner does and doesn’t want done to them.

If you’re struggling to imagine using such an app, you’re not alone. Critics have called them “unrealistic” and “ridiculous”. While encouraging conversations about consent is a noble goal, and conversations about permissions and limits can indeed be sexy, it’s difficult to transform “can you just sign this legal contract to make sure we aren’t assaulting each other” into bedroom talk.

Danaher argues that consent apps are also impractical, creating more problems than solutions. He offers three principal criticisms.

First, digital consent records decontextualize consent, by failing to take into account whether a partner has the capacity to consent or the possibilities of coercion and deception.

What if one party is intoxicated? When it was still around, Good2Go asked users to rate their own intoxication level, but as Danaher points out, drunk people are seldom that drunk according to themselves. And what’s to stop an aggressor from using coercion or deception to obtain a record of consent?

Second, there’s the danger that someone might not record a withdrawal of consent. This could be due to coercion or social pressure, or the victim “freezing” due to trauma. In such a case, the record of initial consent could tip the balance even further than normal in favor of the accused.

It also shifts emphasis away from reading someone’s body language for signs of comfort/discomfort and pleasure/displeasure. Instead, digital consent logged in an app is privileged above all else.

Third is what Danaher refers to as “an air of menace,” which is vague wording for the idea that once a person has recorded consent, he or she may be reluctant to withdraw it, and feel pressure to go along with things he or she doesn’t really want to do.

Danaher concludes: “Because of the tradeoffs involved, it is unlikely app based technologies could ever be created that would significantly address the problems of rape and sexual assault”.

What are consent apps good for?

Danaher notes that consent apps probably hold more value for people accused of sexual assault than for victims. It’s worth going into this further.

If person A verbally propositions person B, but person B refuses, it’s unlikely either party will insist on introducing a consent application to record the interaction. If person B agrees, but then withdraws consent, both can be recorded, but it’s more complicated than it seems.

SaSie and LegalFling allow termination of consent with a click, but person B might have to borrow person A’s phone, or download the app, to do so. Recording withdrawal using We-Consent is only possible with another app in the suite, called What-About-No, but this is designed specifically to deter persistent aggressors (it records an aggressor’s face while playing a video of a police officer telling him or her off).

And if enough time passes between consent and withdrawal of consent, there’s room for an aggressor to argue that sex occurred in the interim. So if anything, the information recorded seems to add more to an aggressor’s claim of innocence, since it provides proof of consent at some point, than to a victim’s claim that consent was violated.

Given this, perhaps we could argue that consent apps are good, at least, at protecting people who are falsely accused of assault. But it’s a process also open to abuse, and one has to wonder: what incentive do people have to record something that might later limit their legal options in the case of assault?

Our digital lives

It seems doubtful that consent apps will take off, at least for now. They’re just too socially awkward. But even if they did, would it be a good thing?

So much of our lives now take place in the digital realm. Instead of talking, we text. Rather than touching, we “poke” (alright, that one is a little 2010). Instead of meeting, we swipe right. Will moving sexual consent to a digital platform actually encourage conversation, or reduce it? Will it add nuance, or take it away? Some discussions need to be face to face, with phones down on the table, not in your hand.

There really is an app for everything these days. But sometimes, perhaps, there shouldn’t be.

Image sources: catkin, LegalFling, rawpixel

Tom Woodley

Previous Article

Plexstorm’s Easter Special: 3 Days, 3 Sex ...

Next Article

SophieBOT Project Hopes to Be the “Siri” ...

Related articles More from author

  • Remote SexSex Tech

    Stroke ‘Til You’re Broke: Penis Ring Will Tip Cam Models Based on Your Erection Size

    August 6, 2018
    By Tom Woodley
  • Image showing Growth of Sex Tech Market is accelerating
    Remote SexSex TechVirtual Sex & Entertainment

    Growth of Sexual Wellness Market Speeding Up and Will Surpass $123B By 2026, Says Lovense CEO

    September 4, 2020
    By Marcus K. Dowling
  • Sex Tech

    Girlplay Shakes Up Safe Sex with Spray-On Condom

    September 20, 2015
    By Hugo Gray
  • Sex Tech

    Brexit: An Uncertain Future for Sex Tech in Britain

    December 9, 2016
    By Future of Sex
  • RobotsSex TechVirtual Sex & Entertainment

    VR Girlfriend Project ‘Virtual Mate’ Puts Male Intimacy Needs First

    September 30, 2019
    By M. Christian
  • RobotsSex Tech

    Robotic Sex Toy Osé Named One of Time’s Best Inventions of 2019

    December 31, 2019
    By Margaret Andersen

  • Her App
    Dating & Relationships

    The Seven Days of Swiping, Day 6: Her, a Dating App’s Valiant Attempt to Match Queer Women

  • This 3-D printed sex toy holder will disguise your dildo as a laser sword.
    Sex Tech

    [PHOTOS] 9 Wacky 3D-Printed Sex Toys You Can Make at Home

  • Chat House 3D Shop
    Virtual SexVirtual Sex & Entertainment

    Multiplayer Sex Game Chathouse 3D Updates Graphics and Adds Sex Toy Support

  • TOP REVIEWS

  • Realistic Sex Games

    Review of the Best Most Realistic Sex Games You Can Play [UPDATED]

    0
  • Multiplayer Online Sex Games

    Review of the Best Massively Multiplayer Online Sex Games

    0
  • Sex Games for Mac

    The Best Sex Games for Mac

    0
  • Best Sex Game Apps for Couples

    The Best Sex Game Apps for Couples for 2020 [Updated]

    0
  • The Best RPG Sex Games of 2020

    0

Like Us on Facebook

Latest Tweets

  • “CES is getting more comfortable with seeing that sex tech companies are not trying to display vulgar images or pro… https://t.co/BPszgA8D6r

    8 hours ago
  • It's time to dive into these parody sex games and become a sexual legend. #cyberpunk #GrandTheftAuto… https://t.co/J5owQWPph5

    Jan 24, 2021
  • Reminiscing about seeing love doll technology in person via Future of Sex footage. https://t.co/XJXSxJdJLg #sexbots

    Jan 23, 2021
  • Who knew face shields and helmets could be so erotic? 😉 Be safe and stylish in these wonderfully outlandish outfit… https://t.co/4JbTZjq5QC

    Jan 22, 2021
  • “Talking about sex toys and how they are designed is a great example of how (digital) technologies are not neutral.… https://t.co/pZWxMKAgU6

    Jan 21, 2021
Follow @futureofsex

Follow us

  • Home
  • About
  • ADVERTISE
  • Contribute
  • Story Ideas?
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
© 2011 - 2020 Future Exploration Network
This website or its third-party tools use cookies to improve user experience and track affiliate sales. To learn more about why we need to use cookies, please refer to the Privacy Policy.

By clicking the agree button or continuing to browse through the website, you agree to the use of cookies. Accept Privacy Policy
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary