Future of Sex
tagline
  • Remote Sex
  • Virtual Sex & Entertainment
  • Robots
  • Human Augmentation
  • Sex Tech
  • Dating & Relationships
  • Bizarre Bazaar 18+
  • Future of Sex Community
  • Remote Sex
  • Virtual Sex & Entertainment
  • Robots
  • Human Augmentation
  • Sex Tech
  • Dating & Relationships
  • Bizarre Bazaar 18+
  • Future of Sex Community
  • Sex Tech Hackers Will Get ‘Touchy-Feely’ at Virtual Event This Weekend

  • How Learning from 2020 Can Give Us Sexier, Healthier Sex Lives in 2021

  • Designers Unveil Wildly Creative Fashions for Pandemic Living

  • This Stroker Gives Female-like Orgasms to Trans People and Men

  • Lora DiCarlo Responds to WOW Tech Group’s ‘Pleasure Air Technology’ Patent Claims

  • Sex Tech in 2021: What Industry Leaders Expect in the Year Ahead

  • VDOM’s ‘Cyber Penis’ Evolves Wearable Sex Tech for All Genders

  • When Will Male Sex Toys Go Mainstream?

Future of Sex is supported by our readers. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

Home > Robots > Scarlett Johansson Robot Opens the Door to Celebrity Crush Replicas

Robots
Home›Robots›Scarlett Johansson Robot Opens the Door to Celebrity Crush Replicas

Scarlett Johansson Robot Opens the Door to Celebrity Crush Replicas

By Antony Scholefield
April 16, 2016
6343
5

Will stars sue to stop their robotic doubles from going on sale?

A Scarlett Johansson robot, based on 3D-printing technology, could be the first step toward owning a realistic replica of your celebrity crush.

Hong Kong graphic designer Ricky Ma spent about $50,000 and 18 months creating his lifelike Mark 1 robot.

Ma told news outlets that he’d based the robot on a particular Hollywood star, although he wouldn’t reveal her name.

But people quickly identified it as Scarlett Johansson, the 31-year-old star of Her, The Avengers, and Lucy, and the only celebrity to be twice named “Sexiest Woman Alive” by Esquire magazine.

Technically impressive

The Mark 1, the robotic Scarlett, has a silicone skin stretched over its 3D-printed skeleton. It can perform detailed facial expressions and respond to spoken phrases.

If a person compliments it, the robot bows, smiles, giggles, and says thank you.

Ma hopes to sell his first robot and use the funds to build more. He also wants to write a book to inspire other developers.

A Scarlett Johansson robot? No, just a robot

The significance of Ma’s robot isn’t just the technical achievement, but the idea of a celebrity crush replica. A market could even exist for celebrity sex robots.

Celebrity blowup sex dolls have existed for years, although certain “originals” have stopped them. Miley Cyrus famously threatened to sue over a blowup doll. Kim Kardashian launched a similar lawsuit in 2010.

Perhaps that’s why Ricky Ma refused to identify the Mark 1 as an imitation of Scarlett Johansson.

If Johansson could prove it was based on her, she could sue Ma for exploiting her “personality rights.”

Legal rights versus robots

The legal concept of personality rights, or publicity rights, applies in a range of countries including the U.S., Canada, China, South Africa, and Australia.

The definition varies between countries and is rarely clear cut, but fundamentally, personality rights mean that a person’s recognizable attributes can’t be exploited for a commercial purpose unless they give permission.

If Ricky Ma or anybody else tried to sell a “Scarlett Johansson robot” in the U.S., the actress could take them to court, arguing (probably successfully) they were exploiting her personality without permission to sell the robot.

Furthermore, most courts don’t limit personality rights to somebody’s name. Anything that identifies the person could apply, including their looks.

Ma might have refused to reveal the inspiration for his robot, but if the likeness is identifiably Scarlett Johansson—as it seems to be, judging by the media reaction—then personality rights could put an end to any attempt to sell the robot in the U.S.

Of course, if Johansson or any other celebrity gave approval for a robot replica, nothing could stop people getting their hands on a copy of their celebrity crush.

Laws a bigger deal for robots than dolls

If a celebrity decided to sue, they might have a better case against a robot than, for example, a blowup sex doll.

If somebody built an unauthorized celebrity robot but didn’t explicitly name it, or perhaps named it just “Scarlet” rather than “Scarlett Johansson,” the legal key would be whether the robot’s appearance were identifiable as the celebrity.

Producers of a basic sex doll, identifiable mostly by hair color and body shape, could claim the resemblance was coincidental. The “Kim” doll manufacturers tried to do this, although their greatest problem was probably their doll’s “biography,” which suspiciously reflected Kim Kardashian’s life.

For most new robots, however, the standard of success is whether they’re realistic or not.

A more realistic robot would probably be more identifiable and therefore more likely to be blocked in court. To avoid a lawsuit, a celebrity robot replica would have to be obviously different from the original person, defeating the whole purpose.

Will Scarlett see red?

Johansson has previously demonstrated an appetite for litigation.

In 2015, she filed a lawsuit over a French novel called The First Thing You See. The book involves a Johansson lookalike who visits a mechanic called Arthur Dreyfuss. Arthur initially thinks the woman is the real Scarlett and treats her like that.

Johansson claimed the novel “exploited” her name, reputation, and image, as well as featured defamatory content. The judge agreed parts were defamatory—but dismissed the claims based on personality rights.

The publishers removed the defamatory parts from the book, but could still seek to translate it or even adapt it into a film.

Other celebrities might be less tempted to sue, even over a robot copy. It’s easy to imagine adult entertainers, for example, investing in robot replicas to be sold for sexual purposes.

A Scarlett Johansson robot could run into legal trouble if it flirts with commercial production, but the broader potential for celebrity crush replicas is still wide open.

Image sources: Goldene Kamera, Insider, Luke Ford

Antony Scholefield

Previous Article

The Kiiroo Review: Bridging the Gap to ...

Next Article

What Do We Really Think About Sex ...

Related articles More from author

  • Robots

    What I Learned About Humanity As a Sexbot Researcher

    April 11, 2019
    By Audrey Pope
  • Robots

    RealDoll Is Developing Sexbots with 3D AI Vision

    February 11, 2020
    By Emily Zawadzki
  • Robots

    A Touch of Tenderness: A Look at Cosmetics and Sex Dolls

    October 17, 2019
    By M. Christian
  • Dating & RelationshipsRobotsSex TechVirtual Sex & Entertainment

    Q&A: Sx Tech Co-founder Explains Why It’s a Hot Time for Women in the Industry

    June 26, 2019
    By Future of Sex
  • Robots

    Marketing Xenosexuality: Women and the Sex Robot Taboo?

    March 13, 2012
    By Bex vanKoot
  • Robots

    Samantha-bot Is a Sex Doll That Needs to Be Seduced: Step Forward or Step Back?

    April 6, 2017
    By M. Christian

  • Robots

    Making Pleasure: Let’s Design the Ultimate Sexbot!

  • Virtual Sex & Entertainment

    Love and Producer: The Dating Game Played by Millions of Chinese Women

  • U-Tsu-Shi-O-Mi21813
    Immersive EntertainmentRemote SexRobotsVirtual SexVirtual Sex & Entertainment

    Japanese Robot Offers Holographic Augmented Reality System for Your Home

  • TOP REVIEWS

  • Realistic Sex Games

    Review of the Best Most Realistic Sex Games You Can Play [UPDATED]

    0
  • Multiplayer Online Sex Games

    Review of the Best Massively Multiplayer Online Sex Games

    0
  • Sex Games for Mac

    The Best Sex Games for Mac

    0
  • Best Sex Game Apps for Couples

    The Best Sex Game Apps for Couples for 2020 [Updated]

    0
  • The Best RPG Sex Games of 2020

    0

Like Us on Facebook

Latest Tweets

  • Follow creators from across the world as they explore intimacy in the digital age for the Rainbows End: Sex Tech Ha… https://t.co/uf4NQQ8PiJ

    19 hours ago
  • "While the sex industry thrived in certain sectors due to rising demands for sex-related products last year, it now… https://t.co/FxiDajAGRu

    Jan 19, 2021
  • Meet @VDOMATL, a medical-grade silicone “cyber penis” that can be worn by all genders. Snap attachments in uniquely… https://t.co/0gGd03DVba

    Jan 17, 2021
  • Future of Sex writer @marcuskdowling speaks to @wearehpg CEO Dominnique Karetsos on how self-expression via sex tec… https://t.co/OYSoXQjFN8

    Jan 17, 2021
  • "Last year showed how important it is to maintain health and emotional balance and it couldn't be a better time to… https://t.co/9lAnFDeCMl

    Jan 17, 2021
Follow @futureofsex

Follow us

  • Home
  • About
  • ADVERTISE
  • Contribute
  • Story Ideas?
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
© 2011 - 2020 Future Exploration Network
This website or its third-party tools use cookies to improve user experience and track affiliate sales. To learn more about why we need to use cookies, please refer to the Privacy Policy.

By clicking the agree button or continuing to browse through the website, you agree to the use of cookies. Accept Privacy Policy
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary