Future of Sex
tagline
  • Remote Sex
  • Virtual Sex & Entertainment
  • Robots
  • Human Augmentation
  • Sex Tech
  • Dating & Relationships
  • Bizarre Bazaar 18+
  • Future of Sex Community
  • Remote Sex
  • Virtual Sex & Entertainment
  • Robots
  • Human Augmentation
  • Sex Tech
  • Dating & Relationships
  • Bizarre Bazaar 18+
  • Future of Sex Community
  • Silicon Valley’s Blind Spot When It Came to OnlyFans and Sex

  • Affording Pleasure: How Universal Basic Income Will Transform Sex

  • 3 Sexy Gifts to Get Your Long-Distance Significant Other

  • Get Your Pole-dancing Fix at Naughty America’s Virtual Strip Clubs

  • Sex Toys Are Good for Male Sexual Health, Too

  • ‘Exo’ Strap-on for Trans Women Signals Growing Diversity in Sex Toy Market

  • Why Disliked Hentai Fans Are More Accepting of Other Comic-Con Groups

  • Hackers Demand Bitcoin to Unlock Hijacked Male Chastity Cages

Future of Sex is supported by our readers. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

Home > Robots > Sexbot Perspectives: Mechanical Dolls Will Harm Society and Promote Rape

Robots
Home›Robots›Sexbot Perspectives: Mechanical Dolls Will Harm Society and Promote Rape

Sexbot Perspectives: Mechanical Dolls Will Harm Society and Promote Rape

By Jenna Owsianik, Editor-in-Chief of FutureofSex.net
July 31, 2016
2083
6

UK ethicist warns about dangers of creating sex robots.

Robots have long fascinated humans, arguably even before the tech existed to create them. Advances in the field are now bringing them into our everyday lives as helpers, analysts, and soon as romantic and sexual companions.

At Future of Sex we reached out to several experts, in and outside of robotics, to ask for their views on machines programmed for sexual gratification. By publishing their responses, we hope to create dialogue and help shape the best possible future—one that will be deeply influenced by breakthroughs in artificial intelligence and robotics.

So we could get insight from people of various backgrounds, we kept our question general:

What is the potential or the possible pitfalls of developing sex robots?

Our first response came from Dr. Kathleen Richardson. Largely known for launching the Campaign Against Sex Robots, she is a Senior Research Fellow in the Ethics of Robotics at De Montfort University in the United Kingdom.

[box type=”shadow”]

Artefacts can’t have sex because they are not alive. A living person can use an object to engage with their own sexuality, but it’s non-reciprocal and non-interactive. The object is not participating in any sex because it’s not alive, or sentient. You can add motors so a robot can move, and put voice programs into it so it can ‘speak’, and silicone skin so it feels humanlike, but none of these things mean anything to the doll/machine. The robot is no different from a chair, except its form is humanoid and it can move about on its own. Before robots, many cultures believe(ed) that the wind was alive because it could move and people could feel it but not see it. They could see how the wind could act on them and the world around them. But the wind is not doing anything. It’s not trying to hurt humans, or to help them, it is used by humans as energy or it can destroy.

This relates entirely to the sex trade. In the sex trade, people (mainly men) are able to buy the bodies of other humans (mainly women and children). In prostitution and pornography, mainly women can be looked upon as instruments of gratification – women though are not instruments. Women and children are not artefacts, but they are related to as if they are. Hence it’s not a big step for some people who operate inside this dehumanised world view to continue making these errors of judgement about what is alive and what is not. The sex trade has nothing to do with sex, but with business and abuse. Sex, when it happens between people, should be consensual and because we are human, it must actually be reciprocal. In ordinary relations, adults that are selfish lovers may engage in sex that’s non-reciprocal, they made be called bad lovers. But when it becomes formalised through buying and selling access to human bodies, it is no longer sex, but slavery. We need to stop thinking about slavery as plantations, chains and colonialism, slavery, of course, includes all these things. What slavery is looking upon a living, breathing, sentient human being as an instrument and relating to them as though they are instruments.

The problem with mechanical dolls is they perpetuate ideas that are harmful to society – that sex is instrumental and not relational. I’m not concerned about the objects, but the impacts on humans. If you keep sex outside of reciprocity, you get rape and murder of women and children.

[/box]

Interested in hearing more of Richardson's views on the ethics of sex robots? Watch the video below of her speaking at a recent TedX event in Belgium.

Image sources: TedX Talks

Tagssexbotperspectives

Jenna Owsianik

Jenna Owsianik is a Canadian journalist and sex tech expert. Since 2014 she has been Editor-in-Chief of FutureofSex.net, the world’s leading publication on how technology is changing human sexuality, today and tomorrow.

Jenna is the primary author of the Future of Sex Report (2016).

Her expertise covers state-of-the-art sex technologies and the major fields driving innovations in intimacy: robotics, virtual reality, remote sex (teledildonics), immersive adult entertainment, human augmentation, virtual sex, and sexual health.

A trained journalist with a Masters of Journalism from The University of British Columbia, Jenna’s reporting has appeared on Futurism.com, Al Jazeera English, CTV British Columbia online, CBS Sunday Morning, CBS 60 Minutes, Global News, and CKNW Radio in Canada and the United States.

As a sex tech industry consultant, she is especially passionate about helping companies deliver accessible services and products to people with disabilities and other underserved communities.

Jenna also runs the sites SexforEveryBody.com, a sex-positive, body-positive online magazine that promotes inclusive sex education; and DisabledSexGuide.com, an adult resource on sex, disability, and erotica.

In 2013, Jenna won two Canadian Online Publishing Awards for her work on The Pain Project, a multimedia site on global access to palliative care.

She won second place at the 2011 Awards for Excellence in Health Care Journalism’s Public Health category for her participation in the documentary Freedom From Pain.

Jenna has an Honors BA in Women’s Studies and Feminist Research as well as a French minor from The University of Western Ontario. She spent a year studying at L’Université Lumière Lyon 2 in Lyon, France.
Previous Article

iDollator Culture: Inside the Minds of Men ...

Next Article

Can Brave New World’s Sensual Cinema Turn ...

Related articles More from author

  • Robots

    Sexbot Perspectives: Robot Sex Workers Will Help Human Relationships

    August 4, 2016
    By Jenna Owsianik, Editor-in-Chief of FutureofSex.net
  • Robots

    Sexbot Perspectives: We’ll Fall Even Deeper for Technology Once It Appears Human

    August 24, 2016
    By Jenna Owsianik, Editor-in-Chief of FutureofSex.net
  • Robots

    Sexbot Perspectives: Robots Will Make Sex Easier for People with Mobility Issues

    September 1, 2016
    By Jenna Owsianik, Editor-in-Chief of FutureofSex.net
  • Robots

    Sexbot Perspectives: Sex Robots Will Lead to Fewer Broken Hearts and Lonely Souls

    August 8, 2016
    By Jenna Owsianik, Editor-in-Chief of FutureofSex.net
  • Robots

    Sexbot Perspectives: Data Ownership and Security Will Be Crucial for Sex Robot Users

    September 14, 2016
    By Jenna Owsianik, Editor-in-Chief of FutureofSex.net
  • Robots

    Sexbot Perspectives: Benefits of ‘Relationship Robots’ Outweigh the Risks

    August 16, 2016
    By Jenna Owsianik, Editor-in-Chief of FutureofSex.net

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Dating & RelationshipsVirtual Sex & Entertainment

    New Generation of Single Chinese Women Are Paying for “Virtual Boyfriends”

  • Remote SexRobots

    The Technology of the Long-distance Kiss

  • Sex Tech

    Pushing Buttons: Is LoveSync Really The Worst Sex Tech—Ever?

  • TOP REVIEWS

  • Realistic Sex Games

    Review of the Best Most Realistic Sex Games You Can Play [UPDATED]

    0
  • Multiplayer Online Sex Games

    Review of the Best Massively Multiplayer Online Sex Games

    0
  • Sex Games for Mac

    The Best Sex Games for Mac

    0
  • Best Sex Game Apps for Couples

    The Best Sex Game Apps for Couples for 2020 [Updated]

    0
  • The Best RPG Sex Games of 2020

    0
  • 23KFollowers

Like Us on Facebook

Follow us

  • Home
  • About
  • ADVERTISE
  • Contribute
  • Story Ideas?
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
© 2011 - 2020 Future Exploration Network
This website or its third-party tools use cookies to improve user experience and track affiliate sales. To learn more about why we need to use cookies, please refer to the Privacy Policy.

By clicking the agree button or continuing to browse through the website, you agree to the use of cookies. Accept Privacy Policy
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

SAVE & ACCEPT