Future of Sex
tagline
  • Remote Sex
  • Virtual Sex & Entertainment
  • Robots
  • Human Augmentation
  • Sex Tech
  • Dating & Relationships
  • Bizarre Bazaar 18+
  • Future of Sex Community
  • Remote Sex
  • Virtual Sex & Entertainment
  • Robots
  • Human Augmentation
  • Sex Tech
  • Dating & Relationships
  • Bizarre Bazaar 18+
  • Future of Sex Community
Hot News

Hot Times Ahead: Tomorrow’s Male Contraceptives May Be More About Temperature, Less About Drugs

Future of Sex is supported by our readers. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

Home > Robots > The Campaign Against Sex Robots: Is Banning Them the Answer?

Robots
Home›Robots›The Campaign Against Sex Robots: Is Banning Them the Answer?

The Campaign Against Sex Robots: Is Banning Them the Answer?

By Hugo Gray
September 29, 2015
3009
8

Two academics argue they will promote the objectification of women and children.

Gold robots

Humanity’s relationship with technology has always been complicated. We worship at the altar of automated convenience, but fear the speed with which it remakes society. Robots are perhaps the ultimate expression of this duality, inspiring utopian dreams and apocalyptic nightmares in equal measure.

But have we stopped to consider the ethical implications of such technology?

Now two European academics are attempting to provide an answer, with a public campaign seeking to ban the production of sex robots.

Founded by robotics ethicists Dr. Kathleen Richardson and Erik Billing, the Campaign Against Sex Robots argues that such machines will exert a profoundly negative influence on society.

Although the movement stops short of advocating the extension of human rights to robots, it asserts that development of sexbots will only reinforce pre-existing inequalities. The group’s website details a laundry-list of damaging effects, such as encouraging the degradation of women and children, and even inadvertently promoting human trafficking.

Rather than develop sex robots, Richardson instead suggests that researchers should pursue, “ethical technologies that reflect human principles of dignity, mutuality and freedom.”

Comparing the dynamic to the prostitute-client relationship, the campaign suggests that such devices will also erode the empathy of their users over time.

According to Richardson’s paper “The Asymmetrical ‘Relationship’: Parallels Between Prostitution and the Development of Sex Robots,” the prostitution model automatically privileges the buyer’s perspective. This has the unintended side effect of diminishing the seller’s subjectivity, reducing them to the status of objects, and reinforcing “relations of power that do not recognize both parties as human subjects”.

Pathologizing desire

However, while Richardson’s campaign raises many important questions about the ethics of the nascent sexbot industry, there are serious flaws to be considered in her prohibition-based approach.

Although Richardson’s warning about introducing pre-existing inequalities is worth heeding, moralistic censorship carries its own dangers. The politics of sexual respectability have historically been a damaging force, stigmatizing any desires that exist beyond an imagined mainstream.

French academics Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari wrote about this as early as 1972 in their philosophical text “Anti-Oedipus,” the first volume of the groundbreaking theoretical work “Capitalism and Schizophrenia”.

They critique the tendency of traditional psychoanalysis to privilege the nuclear family as the primary social model. By promoting the ideal of a perfect family unit, people are taught to be ashamed of their private desires, to pathologize, deny, and repress all atypical urges and unconventional fantasies. Submitting to your predilections is seen as an act of perversion while suppressing these desires is considered natural.

The photo displays iCub, a child-like humanoid robot.

Deleuze and Guattari attribute this to the Freudian figure of Oedipus, which oversimplifies the complexities of desire, and marginalizes those outside the theoretical mainstream:

“…if desire is repressed, it is because every position of desire…is capable of calling into question the established order of society… It is therefore of vital importance for a society to repress desire, and even to find something more efficient than repression, so that repression, hierarchy, exploitation, and servitude are themselves desired.”

And while Richardson’s campaign may intend to merely prevent the sexualization of robots, it also politicizes them, drawing in a broader gender discourse which may be limiting in its scope.

Richardson’s definition of sex robots as “machines in the form of women or children for use as sex objects” is highly restrictive, ignoring what will likely be the post-gendered nature of artificial sexuality.

Feminist academic Donna Haraway has previously outlined the ways that digital identity will disrupt the sex-gender binary in her influential work “A Cyborg Manifesto.”

“There is not even such a state as ‘being’ female, itself a highly complex category constructed in contested sexual scientific discourses and other social practices,” she said. “Gender, race, or class consciousness is an achievement forced on us by the…patriarchy, colonialism, and capitalism.”

Sex robots may also have applications that extend beyond the realm of consumer gratification, with potential for a variety of therapeutic purposes. Like the growing number of hands-free personal sex devices, these robots could prove ideal for aiding those with mobility problems to lead more fulfilling sex lives.

The sex robots are coming

Aside from the inherent difficulty in suppressing technology, Richardson’s crusade focuses too much attention in the wrong direction. Like previous campaigns aimed at banning pornography, it approaches the equation in reverse, blaming the product instead of the environment that created it.

Robot enthusiasts have also been echoing this sentiment on social media, taking to Twitter to express a variety of concerns about the nature of Richardson’s critique:

Seems a bit premature. https://t.co/xS7mymuV7C

— Quin (@ThatMissQuin) September 17, 2015

@FutureofSex Our interconnection with technology is making us smarter but will it change our ethics, will it cause moral relativity? – No

— Dr Michelle Mars (@DrMichelleMars) September 17, 2015

@FutureofSex Dr Richardson, and those who run that campaign, have a very puritanical viewpoint. General society may not understand…

— Davecat (@Davecat) September 17, 2015

@FutureofSex …and manufacturers should do what they can to educate people, in order to dispel fallacies about Synthetiks.

— Davecat (@Davecat) September 17, 2015

@FutureofSex I think a ban doesn’t make sense at this stage, not for the reasons mentioned. Maybe when we get into issues of AI & free will. — Bas Grasmayer (@basgras) September 16, 2015

 

@FutureofSex It is an issue of informed consent, and that comes down to who owns the robots http://t.co/VbMrpOCw5j

— BrianSJ (@BrianSJ3) September 17, 2015

And let’s not forget that this is only one side of the story, with roboticists already working toward engineering love between humans and machines. For instance, the Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Technology Laboratory at the National Taipei University in Taiwan has been developing a field of study known as Lovotics.

Head researcher Dr. Hooman Samani’s work involves a complex AI that simulates the endocrine system, allowing his robots to mimic both the psychological and physical symptoms of being in love. This emotional element demonstrates that at least some researchers are interested in developing machines that go beyond mere sexual gratification. In the future such devices may even be capable of falling in love.

However, while Richardson’s campaign is somewhat short-sighted, it is part of a growing movement that is attempting to examine the way we interact with robots.

In 2012, the academic Sinziana Gutiu wrote a similar study entitled “Sex Robots and Roboticization of Consent” for We Robot, an annual conference on legal issues relating to robotics. And earlier this year, the Tokyo-based telecommunications group Softbank released a humanoid robot named Pepper, which features instructions explicitly forbidding its usage for “sexual acts” or “obscene behavior.”

Although the Campaign Against Sex Robots is still receiving plenty of press, it seems likely that Richardson’s attempt at censorship will eventually end in failure, regardless of the validity of her arguments. Consumer demand will eventually ensure that sexbots are a commercial inevitability.

All that matters now is how we choose to respond to them.

Do you think that sex robots will contribute to real-world objectification?

Image sources: epSos.de, Jiuguang Wang

Hugo Gray

Hugo Gray is the Editor-in-Chief of The Green Fund—a media and news provider committed to driving the industry forward by spotlighting the sector from all angles, providing a constant stream of breaking news, in-depth analysis, and valuable insight into every company operating in the cannabis sector.

As a Senior Writer for Future of Sex, he writes about sex robot features, virtual reality devices, and other innovations in the sextech world.

Hugo also worked as a freelance copyw... riter, freelance journalist, and video editor from 2007 to 2014. He received his Master of Creative Writing from the University of Technology, Sydney, and his Bachelor of Media from Macquarie University. He also studied Screenwriting at the University of Roehampton.  
Previous Article

Teledildonics and Virtual Reality: The Top Sex ...

Next Article

Meet Him, an Artificially Intelligent Lover Inspired ...

Related articles More from author

  • Robots

    Kinky Bots: Exploring Sex, Consent and Asimov’s 3 Laws of Robotics

    December 30, 2018
    By M. Christian
  • Three sex doll heads appear in a display.
    Robots

    Job Posting for £35k/year Sex Doll Tester Gets ‘Overwhelming Response’

    March 12, 2018
    By Future of Sex
  • Robots

    Sex Robot Café: PR Gimmick or Coming to a Coffee Shop Near You?

    November 12, 2016
    By M. Christian
  • Markie Twist headshot
    RobotsVirtual Sex & Entertainment

    Digisexual Identity Will Grow, Yet How Fast Likely Depends on Supply Chain

    January 11, 2022
    By Dr. Markie Twist
  • Robots

    Hashtag #SexRobotGripes Makes Sexbots Go Viral on Twiter

    October 25, 2019
    By M. Christian
  • Scarlett_Johansson
    Robots

    Scarlett Johansson Robot Opens the Door to Celebrity Crush Replicas

    April 16, 2016
    By Antony Scholefield

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Davey Wavey chats with adult model Ray Dexter about a medical procedure to make his already large penis even bigger.
    Augmentation

    Adult Star Ray Dexter Boosts His ‘Brand’ with Penis Fillers

  • Image of statue of beautiful woman face
    Robots

    Sex Robot Manufacturing Is in Need of an Ethical Upgrade

  • A blue circle in the center of a cream background with a faint "BoW" written in the middle. There's an overlay of the Body of Workers logo in black text.
    Sex Tech

    Virtual Gallery Body of Workers Lets Sex Workers Celebrate Themselves

Virtual Lust is a 3D interactive sex game.
3DXChat
Discover the best virtual sex parties and 3D sex worlds.
  • TOP REVIEWS

  • Multiplayer Online Sex Games

    Review of the Best Massively Multiplayer Online Sex Games

    0
  • Harmony ai sex doll from RealDoll

    State of the Sexbot Market: The World’s Best Sex Robot and AI Sex Doll Companies ...

  • Realistic Sex Games

    Review of the Best Sex Games and Most Realistic Sex Simulators [UPDATED]

    0
  • Screenshot of a sexbot from adult entertainment game

    The Best Adult Games on Steam [UPDATED]

  • Screenshot of FeelConnect app future of interactivity intimacy available on Apple and Google Store

    The Best Sex Game Apps for Couples [UPDATED]

Fantasy sex game Dream Sex World lets you explore your wildest desires.
Multiplayer sex world Red Light Center continues to impress with its massive userbase and incredible sex graphics.
A blonde and light-skinned love doll face sppears next to the text Go now realdollxthe future is real.

Like Us on Facebook

Newsletter Subscription

Sign up for our monthly newsletter sharing the very best of the future of sex from our publication and others across the web.

DreamSexWorld offers a stunning XXX 3D world filled with incredibly interactive erotic experiences.

Like Us On Facebook

Facebook Pagelike Widget

RLC_ad_v2

Tweets by @FutureofSex
Future of Sex Report

Follow us

  • Home
  • About
  • ADVERTISE
  • Contribute
  • Story Ideas
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
© 2011 - 2022 Future Exploration Network
This website or its third-party tools use cookies to improve user experience and track affiliate sales. To learn more about why we need to use cookies, please refer to the Privacy Policy.

By clicking the agree button or continuing to browse through the website, you agree to the use of cookies. Accept Privacy Policy
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities...
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
SAVE & ACCEPT