﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Are Patents to Blame for Stalling Teledildonics?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://futureofsex.net/remote-sex/patents-blame-stalling-teledildonics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://futureofsex.net/remote-sex/patents-blame-stalling-teledildonics/</link>
	<description>Latest insights into how human sexuality is changing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 04:23:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jenna Owsianik		</title>
		<link>https://futureofsex.net/remote-sex/patents-blame-stalling-teledildonics/#comment-567</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jenna Owsianik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2016 22:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://futureofsex.net/?p=3072#comment-567</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://futureofsex.net/remote-sex/patents-blame-stalling-teledildonics/#comment-560&quot;&gt;WATCHING YOU NOW&lt;/a&gt;.

thanks!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://futureofsex.net/remote-sex/patents-blame-stalling-teledildonics/#comment-560">WATCHING YOU NOW</a>.</p>
<p>thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: WATCHING YOU NOW		</title>
		<link>https://futureofsex.net/remote-sex/patents-blame-stalling-teledildonics/#comment-560</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WATCHING YOU NOW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 11:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://futureofsex.net/?p=3072#comment-560</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://futureofsex.net/remote-sex/patents-blame-stalling-teledildonics/#comment-559&quot;&gt;Jenna Owsianik&lt;/a&gt;.

http://hbkoplowitz.com/LIC/dildonics/index.html  this page has the whole evolution of the idea and the names of the inventors. Towards the bottom of the page is the infr about WebPower who owned Ifriends and who partnered with the  marketing by Safesex.com .  It pretty much proves who is the one who did it first!.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://futureofsex.net/remote-sex/patents-blame-stalling-teledildonics/#comment-559">Jenna Owsianik</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://hbkoplowitz.com/LIC/dildonics/index.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://hbkoplowitz.com/LIC/dildonics/index.html</a>  this page has the whole evolution of the idea and the names of the inventors. Towards the bottom of the page is the infr about WebPower who owned Ifriends and who partnered with the  marketing by Safesex.com .  It pretty much proves who is the one who did it first!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jenna Owsianik		</title>
		<link>https://futureofsex.net/remote-sex/patents-blame-stalling-teledildonics/#comment-559</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jenna Owsianik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 02:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://futureofsex.net/?p=3072#comment-559</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://futureofsex.net/remote-sex/patents-blame-stalling-teledildonics/#comment-558&quot;&gt;WATCHING YOU NOW&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for sharing this information. It would be great to see a pic of what you explain. Do you know the name of the person who invented this and if the particular Cyberdildoincs device you describe has a name?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://futureofsex.net/remote-sex/patents-blame-stalling-teledildonics/#comment-558">WATCHING YOU NOW</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing this information. It would be great to see a pic of what you explain. Do you know the name of the person who invented this and if the particular Cyberdildoincs device you describe has a name?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: WATCHING YOU NOW		</title>
		<link>https://futureofsex.net/remote-sex/patents-blame-stalling-teledildonics/#comment-558</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WATCHING YOU NOW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2016 08:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://futureofsex.net/?p=3072#comment-558</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The first over the internet devices were used by ifriends live cam models about 15 years ago. Referred to then as CyberDildonics.  These communicated not with a socket but actually used a chat room type of plug in that allowed a user to control four boxes in the shape of a square and choose patterns and colors which in turn could allow changes in the energy flow from the batteries to the device.. The battery power of the toy the model would use, in this communication between the viewer and the mode&#039;s toyl, could be manipulated via the toy&#039;s &quot;eye,.  Basically this extra service that ifriends featured which was a battery operated vibrator that had a power interrupt and would decrease and could be controlled when connected via a small photoelectric  eye. The eye would then allow pulses of power based upon what the &quot;eye&quot; saw. So a more intense darker color for example would then allow more power to the toy and the vibration increased.  The four boxes could be set to pulse patterns and there by controlled over the internet by the viewer making waves of high and low pulses. Or rhythmic pulses . The models could charge more for this ability and the  viewer had some control over the model and what kind of manipulation she would get.  There were a few different available types of devices. One was an actual penis looking vibrator that would enlarge by an inch and retract which would also be manipulated. Basically the pace of the thrusts and the intensity of the vibration could be controlled  or so was the idea.  The person who invented this idea actually is the first idea that used an internet connection. So the company suing everyone is actually just a more advanced copy cat of someone elses idea anyway.  The patent does seem at first glance to be a bit abstract for the technology guidelines.  However it does not mention the use of other types of connections such as attaching a remote controlled device to the screen via wireless technology so I think there may be room to invalidate their claim.  I FIRST USED ONE IN 1998. I was a model on the ifriends website and won a device in a contest they had.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first over the internet devices were used by ifriends live cam models about 15 years ago. Referred to then as CyberDildonics.  These communicated not with a socket but actually used a chat room type of plug in that allowed a user to control four boxes in the shape of a square and choose patterns and colors which in turn could allow changes in the energy flow from the batteries to the device.. The battery power of the toy the model would use, in this communication between the viewer and the mode&#8217;s toyl, could be manipulated via the toy&#8217;s &#8220;eye,.  Basically this extra service that ifriends featured which was a battery operated vibrator that had a power interrupt and would decrease and could be controlled when connected via a small photoelectric  eye. The eye would then allow pulses of power based upon what the &#8220;eye&#8221; saw. So a more intense darker color for example would then allow more power to the toy and the vibration increased.  The four boxes could be set to pulse patterns and there by controlled over the internet by the viewer making waves of high and low pulses. Or rhythmic pulses . The models could charge more for this ability and the  viewer had some control over the model and what kind of manipulation she would get.  There were a few different available types of devices. One was an actual penis looking vibrator that would enlarge by an inch and retract which would also be manipulated. Basically the pace of the thrusts and the intensity of the vibration could be controlled  or so was the idea.  The person who invented this idea actually is the first idea that used an internet connection. So the company suing everyone is actually just a more advanced copy cat of someone elses idea anyway.  The patent does seem at first glance to be a bit abstract for the technology guidelines.  However it does not mention the use of other types of connections such as attaching a remote controlled device to the screen via wireless technology so I think there may be room to invalidate their claim.  I FIRST USED ONE IN 1998. I was a model on the ifriends website and won a device in a contest they had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jenna Owsianik		</title>
		<link>https://futureofsex.net/remote-sex/patents-blame-stalling-teledildonics/#comment-506</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jenna Owsianik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://futureofsex.net/?p=3072#comment-506</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://futureofsex.net/remote-sex/patents-blame-stalling-teledildonics/#comment-504&quot;&gt;Eric J. White&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for the email! I responded but got a delay notification saying my message couldn&#039;t be delivered, but attempts will be made to resend it over the next two days. Hopefully it arrives soon. If not, please do let me know if there is a better way to contact you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://futureofsex.net/remote-sex/patents-blame-stalling-teledildonics/#comment-504">Eric J. White</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for the email! I responded but got a delay notification saying my message couldn&#8217;t be delivered, but attempts will be made to resend it over the next two days. Hopefully it arrives soon. If not, please do let me know if there is a better way to contact you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jenna Owsianik		</title>
		<link>https://futureofsex.net/remote-sex/patents-blame-stalling-teledildonics/#comment-505</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jenna Owsianik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2015 12:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://futureofsex.net/?p=3072#comment-505</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://futureofsex.net/remote-sex/patents-blame-stalling-teledildonics/#comment-504&quot;&gt;Eric J. White&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Eric. Thanks for getting in touch. Can you email me at editor@futureofsex.net so we can continue this discussion?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://futureofsex.net/remote-sex/patents-blame-stalling-teledildonics/#comment-504">Eric J. White</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Eric. Thanks for getting in touch. Can you email me at <a href="mailto:editor@futureofsex.net">editor@futureofsex.net</a> so we can continue this discussion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
